5 Comments

I remember the Deus Ex games.

The idea of genetic manipulation is a pipe dream.

Anyway, when it comes to the COVID shots, the graphene, mRNA, and spike protein were not there when moderna first had issues

There's even a study in my article that found myocarditis in a shot using the same lipid platform, without mRNA.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein

Graphene, mRNA, and spike protein are a distraction from the simple fact that the lipids were likely chosen for their ability to damage people and induce sterility without the need for aluminum and other adjuvants that have been getting bad studies.

Oh and the claim that chips are in the vaccine, like you brought up neuralink.... The chips seen are likely cholesterol crystals.

https://drsambailey.com/?s=Microscope

And neuralink cannot read minds... It's vaporware...

https://posthumousstyle.substack.com/p/neuralink-does-not-read-minds-and

Expand full comment
author

On the tech side of things and beyond the hype cycle, I do think that AI and automation are going to revolutionize the world of work and that all available resources and funding are going to be allocated to this changing environment. Small numbers of people dropping out will not affect this restructuring. There will be no need to keep pushing the current economic system once it breaks down. It has served its purpose and the new model does not require billions of people buying washing machines and Evs to drive to jobs that they won't have. There is an argument that economies of scale break down and make this scenario impossible but I think cost becomes irrelevant when the goals change so drastically. We already function as a human machine hybrid intelligent organism. What comes next is the pursuit of higher goals beyond simply creating more workings humans and manufacturing more trinkets as rewards for their service in the existing on its deathbed economy.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I suspect a future push to a brave new world type system rather than the 1984 garbage that we had since ww1.

We may not need workers with AI... If they can make it work very well with physical tasks.

But what AI can replace today without needing much?... Management and all of these fkin finance and executive jagoffs. Heck, it can replace politicians too. 😂

Even if the AI is corrupt, it can still do a better job than some asshole executives or politicians that are not just corrupt, but worse than AI when it comes to knowledge.

Oh and the self driving cars thing failed badly. So did so called ai surgery, which was tried and failed.

AI is better suited to crunch regular data, not reality which requires a much quicker process that humans (and animals) evolved- spacial intelligence.

That's why the AI companies need more and more power to do their more complex tasks and they're looking to get nuclear plants to power their crap.

Oh and in processing, we pretty much hit a wall. The size is around 4nm these days and those CPUs and GPUs are still power hungry. When they went to 10nm years ago, that was the biggest drop in power use and then it flatlined. So my laptop with a 4 year old chip is as efficient as the new ones. Same with graphics chips like nvidia which is an AI "leader".

Quantum computing was the next big hype, but all they can do is mess with atoms. If it worked, they wouldn't be using traditional gpu and cpu chips.

I think it's bunk just like genetic engineering which I explained in the other comment. Both genes and quantum mechanics are pseudoscience.

Here's a good playlist about the stupid hacks that quantum mechanics is based on and how the experiments that proved it were just bad methods and interpretations.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkdAkAC4ItcHNLDIK9ORydQl_Ik6GJ0bD

Expand full comment
author
Oct 27·edited Oct 27Author

Yup. Agreed on all points. There was a lot of fluff floating around in that 2020-2021 period which may as well have all been ripped straight out of a sci-fi novel.

One question though. If genetic manipulation is a pipe dream then what are we being sold when GM food is supposedly sitting on the shelves of supermarkets?

And another question about nanolipids. Are they replicating, multiplying, growing in some way in order to become the white clots that have been allegedly pulled from people's arteries? If so, how does that work exactly? I don't think I've ever seen this explained. So much material from a tiny dose doesn't make sense unless a process of replication is taking place or something similar.

Expand full comment

Genetic manipulation...

An example of why I think it's pseudoscience.

They made gm plants that couldn't reproduce, called Terminator seeds. But yet, in India, they were suing farmers who didn't use that seed. How exactly did the sterile gm plant spread to other farms?

It's a scam of genetics that was opened when the patent office said you can patent modified life. What do they use to prove that you "stole" their patented stuff? DNA testing, which is notoriously inaccurate and the basis of another sham, PCR testing.

Another huge joke was dolly the sheep where crispr was used to clone the sheep. Supposedly it was the biggest deal and then it stopped happening.

A few years later they promoted some genetically engineered cat that glows in the dark, lol.

That can easily be done without using engineering, but just injecting stuff that glows which ends up in the skin, etc.

Anyway since then, the only big genetic engineering we have seen was the con-vid shots.

As for the lipids, I think the clots are where things get clogged up for a while and junk builds up. Think of a city where a main road is blocked off due to broken down cars in the street who have flat tires from a bunch of nails or whatever ... They're all piled up and it's impossible to get a tow truck to clear the huge pile up.

There's also this theory which adds to that, being an allergic response...

https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/anaphylaxis-the-real-bio-weapon/

Anyway, I tried to look up how exactly the shots replicate and there was little to no actual study on this. Makes sense, since virology and vaccinology rely on word of mouth rather than actual science 😂.

Remember in my "years before mRna" article, there's a link to a study of how even non mRNA (and without so called spike protein) shots cause myocarditis. Myocarditis is basically where the heart muscle gets damaged because it's not getting enough blood flow itself to repair and maintain the heart. Clogged blood flow that feed heart tissue!

Expand full comment