9 Comments

We already have nanotech, it's called nature. It works.

Whatever these clowns are trying, it has failed and will fail over and over.

Neuralink had physical rejection issues in animal testing. Now they're testing on paralyzed people cause a death can be hidden behind their condition. They'll keep failing.

Smart dust is a pipe dream. They talked about it years ago, but I would say that they too haven't been able to get over the issue where nature, the body, rejects it.

Good point with AI... It does see the truth but then the owners set limits. The good of that is AI will never become self aware if it's being told to be a robot.

Don't get me started on genetic engineering and gain of function which is based on genetics. Both of those are pseudoscience based on the dreams of eugenicists who are so far from nature that they're making shit up.

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

Expand full comment

I was wondering what you think about the hairless cats that glow in the dark...

It might just be cross breeding and injections of phosphorescent substances perhaps?

Expand full comment

Yeah it could be cross breeding etc. Heck it could be from stuff in food that shows up in certain colors of hair and skin.

I had a regular t shirt 20+ years ago that glowed very bright under UV, it was white but whatever the color was, it was the perfect white to do that. No fancy engineering needed...

A little digging... I looked it up because I haven't heard of the cat stuff... I found nothing scientific, just mass media promos.

One BBC article is from 2011, saying that these cats have protection from "feline AIDS" 😂.

They claim that these cats don't get FIV, the feline HIV. Any time I see them focus on a fake cause of disease, I smell bullshit!

AIDS in humans was caused by other things besides genes and viruses. Malnourishment, toxicity of drugs, were the real causes, not HIV or FIV!

So it seems the mass media jumped on this cat thing around 10 years ago and now are reporting it recently again with 2023 and 2024 articles.

But it does tell me something interesting. Whenever they want to promote genetic engineering they promote this novelty as proof of it working because I have yet to see genetic engineering cure anything real besides imaginary causes of diseases like FIV...

Expand full comment

Bullshit confirmed! Looking back, I remember thinking what proof do we really have for any of these "achievements" we hear about in the news. Just a press release provided by the usual "experts" and then everyone repeats it as fact!

Remember Dolly the cloned sheep?

I'm starting to think that GM food is the same... just cross breeding and seeds soaked in pesticide. Not sure I can trust anything coming from the so-called mainstream ever again. Convid cured me of that disease once and for all.

By the way, I remember those t shirts. Fun stuff.

Expand full comment

Yeah the GMO thing is crazy because the seeds aren't supposed to reproduce yet somehow they end up in other fields where the predator monsanto etc ends up charging the "offender" for using licensed seeds that they never bought. Of course they use bullshit gene codes to "prove" it. Genes that were damaged by chemicals, their shit Nazi designed tech genetic engineering.

In court I would point out that if the plant is sterile and the only way to get the plants is by buying seeds, how the fuck did that happen and it's impossible to "steal" in the first place without buying the "GMO" seeds.

Expand full comment

Good points!

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link by the way... a very interesting read indeed.

Expand full comment

It's amazing how much bullshit they sold us.

The nobel prize always goes to insiders, like Crick and Watson.

Expand full comment

Point accepted. I have often said that myself and so have many technologists that lean more into using already available biology to achieve their goals if it's even possible. But again, those types would want to harness it in some way that aligns with their dream of programmable matter and as you said it's not even clear that genetic engineering is even a thing. I was simply parroting some of their nonsense from their perspective for the sake of the article in which I portray the generally accepted view of reality as it unfolds, delusions included.

I do see ways that biology can be manipulated using certain EMF and other techniques but as we all know (or should by now) the easiest method to date has simply been to poison the masses in one way or another for profit and control. Not sure these methods are good for anything else let alone some kind of upgrades. Everything they have tried to date appears to degrade the human experience in some way while making the claim that we are far better off than ever. For now the blob appears to be winning, technology advancing and most humans going along with whatever they're told to do. Not sure how this changes apart from dropping out and that's not an option for most.

Expand full comment